On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 09:33:56PM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > Most developers will recognize the Gen6+ SFID names more quickly than > the Gen4-5 ones. Given that they're the same values, just use the new > names. > > Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Kristian Høgsberg <k...@bitplanet.net> > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c > index e2f2fd8..b739cc8 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c > @@ -1310,7 +1310,8 @@ brw_disassemble_inst(FILE *file, struct brw_context > *brw, brw_inst *inst, > string(file, ")"); > } > break; > - case BRW_SFID_DATAPORT_READ: > + case GEN6_SFID_DATAPORT_SAMPLER_CACHE: > + /* aka BRW_SFID_DATAPORT_READ on Gen4-5 */ > if (brw->gen >= 6) { > format(file, " (%d, %d, %d, %d)", > brw_inst_binding_table_index(brw, inst), > @@ -1325,7 +1326,8 @@ brw_disassemble_inst(FILE *file, struct brw_context > *brw, brw_inst *inst, > } > break; > > - case BRW_SFID_DATAPORT_WRITE: > + case GEN6_SFID_DATAPORT_RENDER_CACHE: > + /* aka BRW_SFID_DATAPORT_WRITE on Gen4-5 */ > if (brw->gen >= 7) { > format(file, " ("); > > -- > 2.0.0 > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev