OK, assuming no one complains, I'll push the series later today.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote:
> On 08/06/2014 12:40 PM, Chris Forbes wrote:
>> Yes -- there's no interaction between patches 3 and 4. Blorp only
>> shares the generator.
>
> Okay. Then these two are also
>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com>
>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote:
>>> Does it still build with patch 3 without patch 4?
>>>
>>> On 08/04/2014 01:58 AM, Chris Forbes wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chr...@ijw.co.nz>
>>>> ---
>>>> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_blit_eu.cpp | 3 ++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_blit_eu.cpp
>>>> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_blit_eu.cpp
>>>> index c1676a9..7d4b327 100644
>>>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_blit_eu.cpp
>>>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_blit_eu.cpp
>>>> @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ brw_blorp_eu_emitter::emit_texture_lookup(const struct
>>>> brw_reg &dst,
>>>> unsigned base_mrf,
>>>> unsigned msg_length)
>>>> {
>>>> - fs_inst *inst = new (mem_ctx) fs_inst(op, dst,
>>>> brw_message_reg(base_mrf));
>>>> + fs_inst *inst = new (mem_ctx) fs_inst(op, dst,
>>>> brw_message_reg(base_mrf),
>>>> + fs_reg(0u));
>>>>
>>>> inst->base_mrf = base_mrf;
>>>> inst->mlen = msg_length;
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
