On Saturday, August 09, 2014 06:15:34 PM Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 12:07:58PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > I realize it hasn't even been a week yet, but my remaining 2 weeks until
> > my sabbatical have just filled up, so if anyone needs me to rework this,
> > the sooner you let me know the better.
> 
> Hi Ken. Thanks a lot for reviewing it. I meant to incorporate all the
> changes you requested. If you don't see one there, please let me know.
> 
> I've pushed a rebased branch here:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~bwidawsk/mesa/log/?h=bdw-extents

Looks okay to me - I'd go ahead and push these.

> Do you have any idea or comments about the fixed piglit tests? I haven't
> actually run the rebased branch yet to re-confirm the results. I was
> just curious...

Oh, I missed that.  vs-max-ivec4-int sounds bizarre, but the others sound 
believable.  I recall there were a few ARB_viewport_array tests I hadn't 
figured out, and this seems like the right fix.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to