Yep, it should be allocating just the pointers. Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com>
On 09/02/2014 02:22 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: > From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> > > Coverity reported this, and I think this is the right solution, > since cache->items is struct cache_item ** not struct cache_item *, > we also realloc it using struct cache_item * at some point. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> > --- > src/mesa/program/prog_cache.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/program/prog_cache.c b/src/mesa/program/prog_cache.c > index 07192a9..34609f0 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/program/prog_cache.c > +++ b/src/mesa/program/prog_cache.c > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ _mesa_new_program_cache(void) > if (cache) { > cache->size = 17; > cache->items = > - calloc(1, cache->size * sizeof(struct cache_item)); > + calloc(cache->size, sizeof(struct cache_item *)); > if (!cache->items) { > free(cache); > return NULL; _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev