On 08.09.2014 21:07, Axel Davy wrote: > On 08/09/2014 20:21, Grigori Goronzy wrote : >> On 08.09.2014 14:50, Axel Davy wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> When reading si_dma.c code, it looks like the requested width of the >>> copy is ignored except for PIPE_BUFFER. >>> Perhaps that explains the bugs observed ? >>> >> It isn't ignored. Partial DMA copies (i.e. operations that do not copy >> whole lines) are simply not supported right now, and will fall back to >> resource_copy_region. In fact, it's even stricter: the picthes of source >> and destination have to match. >> >> Grigori > My point is I don't see a check to verify the width of the copy equals > the width of the buffers, > even if I see the pitch test. >
There's a check for that (src_w != dst_w) in si_dma_copy. Grigori > Axel > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
