On Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:14:48 AM Ian Romanick wrote: > This little series is just a bit of house keeping in the valid-to-render > path. There is a follow-up series in progress that tries to optimize > some of these paths for CPU-bound workloads. > > The whole series has been reordered several times. Orignally patches 4 > and 5 of this series were farther apart. As it stands now, they should > probably be squashed (taking the commit message from patch 5).
I would not squash them. One is purely stylistic, and the other changes assert to unreachable. I don't feel strongly though. Patches 2-7 are: Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> > > FWIW... I was not able to measure any performance delta on any test on > any platform at even 80% confidence across this series. These changes are so small I would expect them to be basically unmeasurable. They're worthwhile anyway since they clean up the codebase. --Ken
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
