On 2014-12-14 09:22, kallisti5 wrote:
On 2014-12-14 08:45, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 12/12/14 11:46, Timothy Arceri wrote:
Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri <t_arc...@yahoo.com.au>
---
Its been just under 5 years since the required version
of GCC was set at 3.3.0 at the time it was 7 years old.
I'm proposing bumping it to 4.1.0 which is almost 9 years
old since its used in RHEL 5 which is still supported.
For the record if it was set to 4.3.0 there would be
very few version checks needed at all.
Nicely done Timothy.
Can we just get a confirmation from Alexander von Gluck IV. IIRC he
is/was building mesa with gcc 3.
Alexander, what were the details about the gcc 3 build ? I take it
that
you'll be ok with moving to gcc 4.1.0+ ?
We'll be fine :-), we're using GCC 4.8.3 on our modern builds.
We are using GCC 2.9x for the "BeOS ABI compatible" builds, but we
forked
Mesa 7.9.2 which seems to be the absolute last version of Mesa that
will
compile under GCC 2.9x :-)
https://github.com/haiku/mesa_legacy
Also, I sent an email about removing the SUNPRO C version checks, but
it seems
like it was never delivered:
Nevermind, I just saw Timothy's response to that :-)
-- Alex
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
