On 15/12/14 12:08, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote: > On 12/15/2014 12:21 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: >> >> Above you've mentioned "test failures were gathered ... against 10.3.3", >> which brings the question: >> Should we include those in either one of the 10.3 and 10.4 stable >> branches ? Or are they so insignificant/trivial that we don't expect >> (m)any programs to hit them ? >> > > Hi Emil, > > We are probably not the right people to answer this, so I will let the > reviewers take the call. > > That said, there are a few patches from these series that fix concrete > functionality that has an impact on rendering results, so I suppose > these will be interesting to port to stable branches. > From a quick skim at the commit summaries I cannot pick the rendering fixes. Can you kindly list them out and I'll gladly chase the relevant people.
> There are many others that just improve spec compliance and has little > or no practical impact on functionality, and probably are not worth porting. > I guess the spec compliance depends on how many users there are flexing those code-paths. That aside I do share your view. -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev