On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Carl Worth <cwo...@cworth.org> wrote: > The user can put the cache directory anywhere, so it's not safe to use > fixed-size arrays to store filenames. Instead, allocate the cache > pointer itself as a ralloc context and use that to dynamically > allocate all filenames. > > While making this change, simplify the error handling in cache_get > with a new "goto FAIL" block so the cleanup code exists in a single > place, rather than being spread throughout the function over and over.
Is there some reason we should do this as a separate patch instead of just squashing it? _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
