On 3 March 2015 at 05:21, Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 03/ 1/15 02:31 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: >> >> - Considering the lack of -fvisibility, what is the normal visibility >> "level" - hidden or default ? If the latter this means that every >> library/module built exports a ton of internal symbols. > > > Default, unless you pass the -xldscope=hidden flag to Studio, as the > Xserver does: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/tree/configure.ac?id=xorg-server-1.17.1#n1840 > Would you mind rolling a similar patch for mesa, and testing it out. I'm suspecting that mesa is missing a few PUBLIC annotations. I will roll a similar one for libdrm, as I'm pretty sure it ought to be safe.
Btw did we manage to get through with all the build issues for mesa 10.4/10.5 ? If there is something blocking it, please do shout/file a bug - when you have the time of course :-) >> - Using the __has_attribute macro looks great, although I would suspect >> that it will take a while for GCC and others to adopt(?). > > > Probably, which is why X.Org uses it in addition to, instead of as a > replacement for, the gcc version checks for now: > Ouch.. caffeine deprived brain read your earlier comment as "to replace" :-\ Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
