On Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:38:52 AM Abdiel Janulgue wrote:
> 
> On 06/02/2015 10:54 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > On Monday, June 01, 2015 03:14:26 PM Abdiel Janulgue wrote:
[snip]
> I'm the one who is being funny here. After looking harder and then doing
> some archaeological digs in my previous RS enabling efforts. I came to
> the conclusion you are right. The reason the hardware *seems* to enforce
> this arbitrary offset is that I skipped out the "disable RS on state
> base address update" workaround. Now that I reintroduced it back,
> hardware works completely fine even from offset zero. I'll update the
> code in v2.

Great!  Scratch one mystery :)

Thanks, Abdiel.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to