On 8 July 2015 at 18:07, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As double-negatives are not too appealing in the English language I've
> decided to nuke the common ifndef __NOT_HAVE_DRM_H.
>
> The first three patches are trivial bugfix + cleanups which I've noticed
> while browsing through, 04-09 remove all occurrences of the lastly macro
> (HAVE_LIBDRM is used instead). With the last two dropping kms_swrast
> from the scons/android build.
>
> Note: I'm not 100% sure if the scons build sets the HAVE_LIBDRM macro,
> despite that it builds just fine. If anyone can confirm that will be
> appreciated.
>
For anyone willing to take a look - please focus on 1 & 4, everything
else is dead obvious :-)

[PATCH 01/11] configure.ac: do not set HAVE_DRI(23) when libdrm is missing
[PATCH 04/11] dri_interface: drop __NOT_HAVE_DRM_H magic

Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to