On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Iago Toral <ito...@igalia.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 21:58 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Where does the spec say we should fail to link? I don't see such a >> statement there. > > I have reviewed ARB_gpu_shader5 and I don't see any specific mentions to > what should be done in this particular case. That said, isn't this the > logical thing to do? It is a programming error to link an FS input to a > GS output bound to a non-zero stream and at best the program would have > undefined behavior if the FS input is used. Hiding this from the > developer silently does not seem to be a good idea in any case, whatever > the developer was trying to accomplish he is doing it wrong. > >> It looks like varyings with stream > 0 should not be linked with the >> fragment shader. > > How is this better?
The spec simply says that varyings with stream > 0 are not passed to the rasterizer, which means the matching fragment shader inputs should be uninitialized, but it should still be possible to capture the varyings with transform feedback. That's how I understand the spec. Marek _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
