On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote: > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_inst.h > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_inst.h > index c5132ba..b551334 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_inst.h > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_inst.h > @@ -386,6 +386,7 @@ FF(urb_per_slot_offset, > /* 4-6: */ -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, > /* 7: */ MD(16), MD(16), > /* 8: */ MD(17), MD(17)) > +FC(urb_channel_mask_present, MD(15), MD(15), devinfo->gen >= 8) > FC(urb_complete, MD(15), MD(15), devinfo->gen < 8) > FC(urb_used, MD(14), MD(14), devinfo->gen < 7) > FC(urb_allocate, MD(13), MD(13), devinfo->gen < 7)
Not related to your patch per se, but the write-complete bit is totally gone from BDW+? Not necessary anymore? What's going on in vec4_vs_visitor::emit_urb_write_opcode() then? I couldn't convince myself that we wouldn't ever set the write-complete bit on Gen8+ in that function... _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev