https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92552
--- Comment #7 from Boyan Ding <stu_...@126.com> --- (In reply to Matthew Waters from comment #5) > IIRC, when I made that original patch over a year ago, I stole that logic > from the GLX code which does exactly the same thing. > > Essentially the problem is whether "OpenGL version" is the requested version > in the EGLConfig or the effective version. I would argue that it's > ultimately impossible to know the effective version without creating a > context so the "OpenGL version" therefore refers to the requested version in > the EGLConfig. > > I also wonder about the relevance. Forward compatible contexts only > appeared in GL >= 3.0 versions so if an application knows about > forward-compatible, it knows that it's GL >= 3.0 only and must at least > request a GL >= 3.0 to be able to use the flag. Requesting a GL < 3.0 > context with forward compatible is a dangerous game to be playing. Just checked with the glx code and I think you got the point here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
