On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've got a snapshot of the internal BSpec as PDFs that still has > useful Ironlake information, and that's where the "NoCMask" > information comes from. The G45 docs simply say that 0b11 is > "Reserved", but it's unclear whether that's actually true or if they > made *another* mistake. :)
I meant to say -- because the G45 docs actually say "[DevBW, DevCL] NoCMask is not supported." but don't tell you which bit combination of MaskControl/MaskControlEx is NoCMask. I think they probably made a mistake in the scrubbing process and it actually exists on G45. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
