On 20 October 2015 at 17:40, Arnaud Vrac <raw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On 20 October 2015 at 17:06, Julien Isorce <julien.iso...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 19 October 2015 at 17:16, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 17 October 2015 at 00:14, Julien Isorce <julien.iso...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > This patch allows to use gallium vaapi without requiring >> >> > a X server running for your second graphic card. >> >> > >> >> I've sent a lengthy series which should mitigate the need of some >> >> hunks. >> > >> > >> > Ok I'll wait for your patches to land before going further on this >> > patch. >> > Should I expect vl_winsy_drm.c in your patches ? Not sure do understood >> > that >> > part. Actually I though about having "vl_screen_create_drm" and renames >> > vl_screen_create to vl_screen_create_x11 (because it takes XDisplay in >> > params) but then I got confused because vl_winsys.h includes Xlib.h. >> > Should >> > future vl_screen_create_drm be in another header, vl_drm.h ? >> > >> My series flattens the if GALLIUM_STATIC_TARGETS spaghetti. Although >> it's more of a FYI rather than "wait until they land". >> >> On the winsys_dri vs winsys_drm side - I'm not planning to do any work >> there, neither I did notice the Xlib.h dependency in vl_winsys.h. >> >> What I'm pondering is about having a 'proper' drm backend, although >> admittedly I haven't looked exactly what libva{-intel-driver,}'s >> definition of that is. I'd assume that moving the non-winsys specifics >> (from vl_winsys_dri.c) to vl_winsys.h and adding a >> vl_screen_texture_from_drawable() equivalent for drm (amongst others). >> As you can tell much of this is guesswork, so if you don't have the >> time and others are happy with the approach as is, feel free to >> ignore. > > > A wayland backend would be nice too. I'm afraid not many of us have the time and/or interest to work on that. Patches implementing it will be kindly accepted :-)
> Right now vainfo under wayland just > crashes. > I guess we can separate the VA_DISPLAY_foo switch statement into a separate patch which can also go into stable. Personally I don't mind either way. Cheers, Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev