On Tuesday 30 September 2008 14:21:10 Stephane Marchesin wrote: > Hi again, > > I've adapted (but didn't push it) gallivm to llvm 2.4 (svn) API > changes. But then there's an obvious question about what we're doing > with those API changes ? Do we settle on a given version, or do we > want to adapt it as the llvm API changes ?
I think what we want to do is just use 2.4 from now on. There was a couple of fixes there that are very useful to us. So I say push it. >From now on until we find some kind of a blocking bug in LLVM 2.4 I suggest we stick with it so that we don't have keep compiling LLVM from svn and just use the official packages. And we'll keep on using the official packages until: - we find a serious bug that really blocks us and we get LLVM guys to fix it in svn, - there will be features in svn that we really need and lack of them would block as well Does that sound ok? z ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
