Mark Kettenis <mark.kette...@xs4all.nl> writes: > > From: Adam Jackson <a...@nwnk.net> > > Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:51:13 -0500 > > > > On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 16:29 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > > > > > tom fogal wrote: > > > > Is there any reason TLS for glX is disabled by default? [snip] > > > I vaguely recall there being some interaction with the X server. > > > If Mesa is built for TLS, then the X server must also be built > > > for TLS. [. . .] > > > > There's no intrinsic reason that the GLX loader couldn't support > > both, I suppose, but it would be kind of lame. [plus selinux issue] > > Is the TLS you're talking about here an abreviation for Thread Local > Storage? If so then even OpenBSD doesn't have (sensible) support for > it.
Yes, it is. In the case that we're building against an X server, is there perhaps some kind of configure-time test we could do? Then the Mesa default could be `autodetect' instead. -tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
