Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:50:14 +0100, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed that quite a lot of piglit tests fail with swrast and softpipe. I >> was asked for sending my stats to ML so that people working on the software >> rasterizers are aware of that (I guess they already know). Please see this >> page: >> >> http://storm.unas.cz/drivers_compared/ >> >> The parser tests and some pretty long tests are not included. The ratio >> pass/all is highest for r300c and lowest for more feature-rich r300g but >> swrast is worse than softpipe which is a shame. >> >> Tested with git master on 6th February 2010. >> r300g stats are the only ones not tested with pure git master but with my >> own additional patches in my private (localhost) repo. > > On my system, swrast fails a lot because it exposes ARGB8888 visuals on > a depth 24 buffer, which means the alpha bits get dropped when > putimaging them to X. It seems like we need to fix up its visuals list > to not do that.
Ah, I usually run glean through a shell script which just tests one visual. I'm probably not seeing this problem for that reason. -Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
