Unfortunately, this means to get rid of $RADEON_CFLAGS $RADEON_LDFLAGS
in other source files. As I said I am no autotools expert, but if libdrm_intel does not need any furher CFLAGS/LDFLAGS, why libdrm_radeon is different? The benefit of "simplifying" would mean to have libdrm_{intel,radeon} handled the same way in configure.ac. I have sent a V2 of my proposals with really checking for $LIBDRM_RADEON_REQUIRED (keeping $RADEON_CFLAGS and $RADEON_LDFLAGS). -- Sedat On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Luc Verhaegen <l...@skynet.be> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 02:16:03PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> what do you think about this proposal? >> >> -- >> Sedat > > Makes _a_ _lot_ of sense. > > Luc Verhaegen. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev