http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27254
Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #5 from Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> 2010-03-26 09:49:15
PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I think I should brought this up since 7.8 is about to be released. In
> gl_API.xml, we have
>
> <function name="HistogramEXT" alias="Histogram" static_dispatch="false">
>
> C and X86-64 dispatcher correctly hide glHistogramEXT. However, up until
> recently, X86 dispatcher exposed the function. I've made a commit
>
> 41a87a43e11c664935349f938022d58d3e22da4e
>
> to honor gl_API.xml and hide the symbol (and some others). Does this sound
> fine to your or is this considered an ABI breakage?
Sorry for the slowness of my reply. As long as the set of symbols exposed on
x86 isn't reduced to less than the set of symbols exposed on x86-64, I think
the change should be fine.
Since the original report wasn't actually a bug in Mesa, I'm going to close
this as NOTABUG.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
