Thanks for your nice and quick explanation! On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > Technically speaking, Mesos has a less expressive model for expressing > resource requirements. The thesis of Mesos is that the negotiation between > application and scheduler can make up for this missing information. Mesos > was also first to "market", but Hadoop nextGen is catching up fast. The > MR-279 has code that works, albeit with some issues in production use. From > all reports, these issues are being resolved quickly as Yahoo's considerable > QA resources come to bear. > > Politically speaking, Mesos has a nearly inactive mailing list which, to > outward appearances, indicate a nearly inactive project. There is some > evidence that considerable activity is occurring off-list, but this is a > process bug in the Apache model since "if it doesn't happen on the list, it > doesn't happen". > > On the other side, Hadoop nextGen has the Hadoop community pretty much > behind it. Since HNG has the potential to breakdown some of the deadlocks > that have plagued the Hadoop community release process, there is > considerable enthusiasm for it. > > Combined, these factors make it much more likely that HNG will be the > dominant force in the Hadoop world. That is, more likely in my own > estimation. Others may differ. > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm newbie, and wonder what's the main differences between Hadoop >> nextGen and Mesos. >> >> Thanks. >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> @eddieyoon >> >
-- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
