Is there any consensus on how to place process utilities in stout? I would expect this to be in a process:: namespace but of course that is confusing because we use libprocess, which should perhaps have a libprocess:: namespace instead..
I'll be moving process utilities etc into stout, hopefully with the same calls for linux and OSX but I'm not yet certain if that is possible. I would like to place these in a process.hpp file inside a process:: namespace. I think these read very nicely: process::alive(pid_t) process::children(pid_t) process::stat(pid_t) Thoughts? On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Yan Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > This batch of commits changed the reaper to use "Future" as the > notification mechanism. > > Sequence: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10744/ > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/ > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10746/ > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10747/ > > Best, > Yan > -- > Jiang Yan Xu <[email protected]> @xujyan <http://twitter.com/xujyan> >
