> On April 29, 2013, 9:19 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > third_party/libprocess/third_party/stout/include/stout/os.hpp, line 1042
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/diff/2-3/?file=285028#file285028line1042>
> >
> >     I think it reads better as "A process is not considered alive iff it is 
> > terminated AND reaped". Thoughts?

Yeah I think this is better. Confusing terms...


- Jiang Yan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/#review19893
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 30, 2013, 1:16 a.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 30, 2013, 1:16 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Vinod Kone, and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/reaper.cpp bd3dcef07c370ad338b478755bf8f7ce6408e4a3 
>   third_party/libprocess/third_party/stout/include/stout/os.hpp 
> 4d51693504f15236c131600737d0b6ddb6a1a819 
>   third_party/libprocess/third_party/stout/include/stout/proc.hpp 
> 19000eb182cef4ecbf10fc3aa6c6e6c076f1ac46 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> N/A
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to