On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Robert Ransom <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/23/14, Trevor Perrin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> But the main goal here (IMO) is "unlinkable communications", which >> it's not in opposition too (whether an observer can tell which users >> are talking). > > The security properties which 'Drac' > (http://freehaven.net/anonbib/#drac-pet2010) attempts to provide seem > better to me
Could you elaborate? Drac assumes each user "has a long term identifier IDi that is known by all her contacts", so it seems to have a similar model of unlinkable communications / linkable pseudonyms as (e.g.) Pond. There are lots of differences though, so I'm curious what you particularly like about this. Trevor _______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
