On 31 March 2014 20:11, Ximin Luo <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm more and more favouring the idea that, in an end-to-end-secure system, > you should *not* consider a message "definitely received" by the intended > recipients, until you receive an ACK from them that strongly (but perhaps > indirectly) refers to the message that you sent. (With email this is a no-no > but here we've already authorized the sender.)
+1! I once had a bug in my XMPP server that caused it to drop ~50% of messages. It took a surprisingly long time and some rather odd conversations before anyone noticed. _______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
