On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Tony Arcieri <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Trevor Perrin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> (1) It seems feasible to put messages into a causal/partial order by >> having them piggyback references and hashes to their parents (aka >> "causal predecessors"). >> > > I think that vector clocks (which wouldn't necessarily refer to previous > messages, perhaps just message counts since joining a conversation) are the > best bet at getting a realistic *partial* (not total) ordering of events > And Interval Tree Clocks should be able to handle join and parts as well. Alex
_______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
