On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, David Leon Gil <[email protected]> wrote: > As a note re Pond: It doesn't do a good job concealing social-network > information. In particular, the single-identity-per-client constraint > means that any two colluding participants can determine that they're > talking to the same person.
It's a design decision we've discussed, e.g. https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000215.html Having a "linkable pseudonym" means two participants can corroborate a third party's fingerprint, which has advantages. Anyways, this is off-topic for the thread. Trevor _______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
