You're asking about encrypted/secure mailing lists, am I right? Simplicity is always a good thing to aim for. How is a fancier solution with advanced crypto better than saying "The list moderator runs a tightly written web forum package via Tor".
This web forum would not have end to end encryption in the classical sense of course, but how does it differ in practice? - The list moderator sees all messages. But that's expected behaviour. - Anyone in the group sees all messages in the clear. But that's expected behaviour. - If the server is seized, the taker can see all the messages. But if the server *is run by* the list moderator, this is strictly equivalent anyway: someone who wants to see all messages without being formally added can just take the computer/credentials of anyone on the list. The primary advantages being you don't need to distribute software, there's no key distribution issues etc.
_______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
