Sounds somewhat similar to EPFL's "Cothority" idea: https://github.com/dedis/cothority https://zerobyte.io/files/talks/2015-12-27-collective-authorities-32c3.pdf
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Watson Ladd <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > There has been a lot of discussion on tor-dev about integrating CONIKS > into tor messenger. They seem to have that pretty much under control, > but I'm wondering if it would make sense to have one public federated > CONIKS service that multiple messaging services could all use. This > way we have auditing code and server code for everything, together > with ways to extract keys and manage accounts. > > Why is this an utterly terrible idea? > Sincerely, > Watson > _______________________________________________ > Messaging mailing list > [email protected] > https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging > -- Tony Arcieri
_______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
