messaging  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers Jeff Burdges
  • Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers Jeff Burdges
  • Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers Joe
  • Re: [messaging] Question regarding Whatsapp/Signal Safety Numbers Vincent Breitmoser
• [messaging] Keybase Teams Support Maxwell Krohn
• [messaging] NaCl comm relay: file support Max Skibinsky
• [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Jeff Burdges
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Jeff Burdges
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Michael Rogers
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Michael Rogers
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Michael Rogers
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Michael Rogers
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Michael Rogers
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Michael Rogers
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents Michael Rogers
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents grarpamp
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents George Kadianakis
  • Re: [messaging] Panoramix decryption mixnet messaging spec and design documents dawuud
• [messaging] np1sec audit and public release Dmitri Vitaliev
• [messaging] Briar is in public beta Michael Rogers
  • Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta Yui Hirasawa
  • Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta Alec Muffett
  • Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta Nadim Kobeissi
  • Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta carlo von lynX
  • Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta carlo von lynX
  • Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta Eleanor Saitta
  • Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta Michael Rogers
  • Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta Nathan of Guardian
  • Re: [messaging] Briar is in public beta carlo von lynX
• [messaging] new peerio architecture Michael Carbone
  • Re: [messaging] new peerio architecture Mikalai Birukou
  • Re: [messaging] new peerio architecture Nadim Kobeissi
• [messaging] Sesame spec Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] Sesame spec Tom Ritter
  • Re: [messaging] Sesame spec Trevor Perrin
• [messaging] Evaluation of ZRTP clients Dominik Schuermann
• [messaging] RFC: (n+1)sec secure group chat - protocol specification draft Ruud Koolen
• [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat) Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat) Natanael
  • Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat) Jack O'Connor
  • Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat) Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat) Jack O'Connor
  • Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat) Dominik Schuermann
  • Re: [messaging] Looking up public keys on public sites (was Re: Keybase Chat) Trevor Perrin
• [messaging] CONIKS vs Key Transparency vs Certificate Transparency vs Blockchains Tao Effect
• [messaging] Keybase Chat Jack O'Connor
• [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server? Ron Garret
  • Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server? Vincent Breitmoser
  • Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server? Nadim Kobeissi
  • Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server? Ron Garret
  • Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server? Nadim Kobeissi
  • Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server? Ron Garret
  • Re: [messaging] X3DH: why put OTPKs on the server? Nadim Kobeissi
• [messaging] Regarding the "AD" Value in X3DH Spec Nadim Kobeissi
• [messaging] SKS gossip protocol mentor? Daniel Roesler
  • Re: [messaging] SKS gossip protocol mentor? Daniel Kahn Gillmor
• [messaging] evolving Autocrypt effort: e-mail encryption for everyone holger krekel
  • Re: [messaging] evolving Autocrypt effort: e-mail encryption for everyone Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [messaging] join us tomorrow for 'Fridays with (n+1)sec' chat Dmitri Vitaliev
• [messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails Natanael
  • Re: [messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails Vincent Breitmoser
  • [messaging] confidentiality trumps authenticity was: OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails holger krekel
  • Re: [messaging] confidentiality trumps authenticity was: OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [messaging] confidentiality trumps authenticity was: OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails holger krekel
  • Re: [messaging] confidentiality trumps authenticity was: OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails Tony Arcieri
  • Re: [messaging] OpenPGP Trust is broken Was: On Signed-Only Mails Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [messaging] berlin mail encryption meetup Dec 14-18th / INBOME holger krekel
• [messaging] First Pre-Release of coniks-go (0.1.0) Marcela Melara
  • Re: [messaging] First Pre-Release of coniks-go (0.1.0) Ian Miers
• [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Vincent Breitmoser
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Vincent Breitmoser
  • Re: [messaging] [openpgp] On Signed-Only Mails Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Taylor R Campbell
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Moritz Bartl
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Bjarni Runar Einarsson
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Maxwell Krohn
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Bjarni Runar Einarsson
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Robert Obryk
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Bjarni Runar Einarsson
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Robert Obryk
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Bjarni Runar Einarsson
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Tobias Mueller
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Natanael
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Bjarni Runar Einarsson
  • Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [messaging] [openpgp] On Signed-Only Mails Vincent Breitmoser
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails stef
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Daniel McCarney
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Daniel McCarney
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Ben Laurie
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails Peter Gutmann
  • Re: [messaging] On Signed-Only Mails Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] [FORGED] Re: On Signed-Only Mails Peter Gutmann
• [messaging] 33c3 : We Fix the Net talks Jeff Burdges
• [messaging] Double Ratchet spec Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec Nadim Kobeissi
  • Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec Nadim Kobeissi
  • Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec stef
  • Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec Nikos Roussos
  • Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec Moxie Marlinspike
  • Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec Sam Lanning
  • Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec Nadim Kobeissi
  • Re: [messaging] Double Ratchet spec Sven M. Hallberg
• [messaging] X3DH Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] X3DH stef
  • Re: [messaging] X3DH Trevor Perrin
• [messaging] deniability data point Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] deniability data point Tony Arcieri
  • Re: [messaging] deniability data point Sam Lanning
  • Re: [messaging] deniability data point Jeff Burdges
  • Re: [messaging] deniability data point Joseph Bonneau
• [messaging] XEdDSA specification Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] XEdDSA specification Martin Thomson
  • Re: [messaging] XEdDSA specification Trevor Perrin
• [messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation Matthew Hodgson
  • Re: [messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation Jason A. Donenfeld
  • Re: [messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation Tony Arcieri
  • Re: [messaging] Signal Protocol Documentation Jeremy Cahill
• [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Tony Arcieri
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Hanno Böck
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Tobias Markmann
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Tobias Markmann
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Ben Laurie
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Matthew Hodgson
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Tom Ritter
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Tony Arcieri
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Tony Arcieri
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen e2e encryption component Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen e2e encryption component Tony Arcieri
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen e2e encryption component Natanael
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Hanno Böck
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol Jeff Burdges
  • Re: [messaging] IETF standardization of a next-gen messaging protocol carlo von lynX
• [messaging] RFC: (n+1)sec secure group chat - security properties and UX design Ruud Koolen
  • Re: [messaging] RFC: (n+1)sec secure group chat - security properties and UX design Ximin Luo
  • Re: [messaging] RFC: (n+1)sec secure group chat - security properties and UX design Ruud Koolen
• [messaging] Signal Double Ratchet (Axolotl Protocol) with header encryption Linus Lotz
• [messaging] Mesh/Recrypt Tony Arcieri
  • Re: [messaging] Mesh/Recrypt Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [messaging] Mesh/Recrypt Tony Arcieri
  • Re: [messaging] Mesh/Recrypt Andy Isaacson
• [messaging] Wireshark Dissector Tarkan Y
• [messaging] Mailvelope Key Server and "fallback" keyservers (was Re: Axolotl for email) Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] Mailvelope Key Server and "fallback" keyservers (was Re: Axolotl for email) Tankred Hase
• [messaging] Email obstacles and experiments Trevor Perrin
  • Re: [messaging] Email obstacles and experiments Wei Chuang
• [messaging] The downsides of no key verification Jason A. Donenfeld
  • Re: [messaging] The downsides of no key verification Nadim Kobeissi
  • Re: [messaging] The downsides of no key verification Jason A. Donenfeld
  • Re: [messaging] The downsides of no key verification [email protected]
• [messaging] Axolotl for email Wei Chuang
  • Re: [messaging] Axolotl for email Daniel Kahn Gillmor

• Earlier messages
• Later messages