On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Wang Larry-B38019 <b38...@freescale.com> wrote: > Sorry for responding late for the previous version. We still need consider > the concerns we have about meta-fsl-arm vs meta-fsl-imx/meta-fsl-vybrid. > Freescale can make more ARM based processors. It will be hard to put all of > them under one umbrella.
Core board support under one layer is not that hard. It should only be adding a machine file, and maybe a new kernel / u-boot recipe (or maybe just pointing at a different SHA/SRC_URI). Most other stuff will live in a vybrid layer that adds all the ancillary support recipes. -M > > Thanks! > Larry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537 > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 12:17 AM > To: Otavio Salvador; Bob Cochran; McClintock Matthew-B29882 > Cc: Li Yi i.MX-R80015; Mahadevan Mahesh-R9AADQ; Weng White-B18292; Angolini > Daiane-B19406; Wang Larry-B38019; Liu Ting-B28495; Schmitt Richard-B43082; > Trefny Thomas-RAT188; meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Please review the proposal of FSL Yocto layers reorg - updated > version on 28-Feb > > Hello all, > > Thanks a lot for the comments. > > I did some update according to the feedback and removed some bits of internal > activity. Please review and comment. > > > Best Regards, > > Zhenhua > > _______________________________________________ > meta-freescale mailing list > meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
