ahhh...ok so I think I will have to port the mt9t112 driver to freescale's way of doing things, namely in the drivers/media/video/mxc/capture since freescale is not using soc_camera.
On a somewhat related question, what is this "imx-devel" branch about?: https://github.com/RobertCNelson/imx-devel/branches I see all kinds of references to imx-devel and v3.x.y.imx-devel here. How come this is all the way up to 3.8 while Freescale is still on 3.0.35. Something doesn't seem right! Thanks On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Eric Bénard <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ashwin, > > Le Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:53:41 -0400, > Ashwin Kirpalani <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Browsing around freescale's linux-imx sources, I noticed that the correct > > version of the driver that I want (mt9t112.c) is indeed in the linux-imx > > sources from freescale. It is here: > > https://github.com/Freescale/linux-imx/tree/master/drivers/media/video. > So > > why is it not the same in yocto's linux-imx-3-0-35 version? Could someone > > please explain how yocto's version diverges from freescale's kernel > version > > and why? Thanks > > > at least 2 reasons : > - this tree is not an officiel Freescale one despite the Freescale name > of the github account, > - you are looking at the master branch which is mainline, when the > patch collection branches for Freescale's kernels are in branch > patches-imx-2.6.35_10.12.01 and patches-imx-2.6.35_11.09.01 > > If you want the kernels from Freescale you can have a look here > (especially the imx_ branches) : > http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/imx/linux-2.6-imx.git/ > > Best regards > Eric >
_______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
