On 04/19/2013 05:03 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
Le Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:46:48 -0300,
Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Otavio Salvador
<[email protected]> wrote:
Usually kernel would do the right thing but not in our case. Some
I don't understand. Why 'usually'? In what sense is our case different?
maybe most defconfig support only one machine when those in
meta-fsl-arm support several machines sometimes with different LOADADDR
requirements and thus need the precision to get a working kernel on a
specific platform at compile time.
I'm OK to accept the meta-fsl-arm workaround for this LOADADDR error. At
least until we figure out a better way to properly fix that.
Otavio, what do you think about adding KERNEL_EXTRA_ARGS +=
"LOADADDR=${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}" in mxc-base.inc and mxs-base.inc instead?
Daiane
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
