On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:00 PM, John Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Luca - > > I'm not sure if the policy has changed, but I think you'll need to send > separate patches series for the machine, U-boot, and the kernel, rather than > bundling them all up in one large patch. These should be maintained > separately. > > A couple of other things: > - Normally, the defconfig needs to be saved using make savedefconfig from > the kernel Kbuild system. This significantly reduces the size of the > defconfig file and makes for easier comparison/control later on. > - Since you are maintaining a separate kernel repository on Github, why not > consider incorporating some of these patches into the kernel instead of > maintaining them separately in the recipe? The ARM GCC patches (ARM 7670 > and the memset fix) are examples.
Your remarks are correct; by the way, use linux-udoo and u-boot-udoo recipes as 'unico' is too generic. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
