In this case we have reasons specific to our test case environments that require us to create our own plugin set.
We have 2 U-boots one that is community and one that is Freescale so I see it no different. Customers can choose which they want to use. Lauren From: John Weber [mailto:rjohnwe...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 6:21 PM To: Post Lauren-RAA013 Cc: Daiane Angolini; meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org; Carlos Rafael Giani Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 3/5] gst1.0-fsl-plugin: Add Freescale Gstreamer1.0 Plugin for MX6 Hi Lauren, On Friday, August 29, 2014, Lauren Post <lauren.p...@freescale.com<mailto:lauren.p...@freescale.com>> wrote: Freescale developed their own Gstreamer 1.0 plugins so they are not a replacement but another choice that customers can use. Can we get a comparison with what Carlos has done? Having two sets of plugins that perform the same function would be very confusing. Also, I would think Freescale wouldn't bother to spend valuable resources on work when they could make use of the community has already done. It is not linked to gst-fsl-plugin. They are 2 separate plugin sets however there are probably some common areas like aiur and beep which is why we chose to use same version number. Lauren From: meta-freescale-boun...@yoctoproject.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','meta-freescale-boun...@yoctoproject.org');> [mailto:meta-freescale-boun...@yoctoproject.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','meta-freescale-boun...@yoctoproject.org');>] On Behalf Of John Weber Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 1:33 PM To: Daiane Angolini Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org');> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 3/5] gst1.0-fsl-plugin: Add Freescale Gstreamer1.0 Plugin for MX6 On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Daiane Angolini <daiane.l...@gmail.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','daiane.l...@gmail.com');>> wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Zidan Wang <b50...@freescale.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','b50...@freescale.com');>> wrote: > From: Wang Zidan > <b50...@freescale.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','b50...@freescale.com');>> > > Freesclae Gstreamer1.0 Plugins: typo: Freescale It´s Gstreamer 1.0 first release, isn´t it? Why it´s version is 4.0.1? It make me think that, it´s linked someway with gstreamer 0.1 gst-fsl-plugin, right? > Audio Decoder: beepdec > Video Decoder: vpudec, gst-libav What about vpuenc? Also is this compatible with kernel 3.10.17_1.0.1? > Demux: aiurdemux > Video Render: imxv4l2sink > Camera Source: imxv4l2src What makes me wonder what would be the reason for changing the change on video render/camera source plugin name. I think this is OK since many pipeline definitions have to change when moving from 0.10 to 1.0. E.g. playbin2 => playbin > > - Support Audio/Video local playback > - Support HTTP/RTSP Streaming playback > - Support RTP/UDP MPEGTS Streaming > - Support RTSP Streaming Server Great! > > Signed-off-by: Wang Zidan > <b50...@freescale.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','b50...@freescale.com');>> > --- > .../gstreamer/gst1.0-fsl-plugin_4.0.1.bb<http://gst1.0-fsl-plugin_4.0.1.bb> > | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 > recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gst1.0-fsl-plugin_4.0.1.bb<http://gst1.0-fsl-plugin_4.0.1.bb> > > diff --git > a/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gst1.0-fsl-plugin_4.0.1.bb<http://gst1.0-fsl-plugin_4.0.1.bb> > > b/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gst1.0-fsl-plugin_4.0.1.bb<http://gst1.0-fsl-plugin_4.0.1.bb> > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..107a76e > --- /dev/null > +++ > b/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gst1.0-fsl-plugin_4.0.1.bb<http://gst1.0-fsl-plugin_4.0.1.bb> > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ > +# Copyright (C) 2014 Freescale Semiconductor > +# Released under the MIT license (see COPYING.MIT for the terms) > + > +require gst-fsl-plugin.inc > + > +SRC_URI = "${FSL_MIRROR}/gst1.0-fsl-plugins-${PV}.tar.gz" > +S = "${WORKDIR}/gst1.0-fsl-plugins-${PV}" > + > +EXTRA_OECONF += " CROSS_ROOT=${PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR}" > + > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "38d20aa22910a841593318aa638fb702" > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > "972babc09f53fb0139a350c5b4267101793fcb96d289c4ae402d6a6ddddbe085" > + > +DEPENDS_append = " gstreamer1.0 gstreamer1.0-plugins-base gpu-viv-g2d" What happens in case user want to use gstreamer without g2d support? Is it impossible? Only to make sure, gpu-viv-g2d is GPU hardware, right? Daiane > + > +FILES_${PN} = "${libdir}/gstreamer-1.0/*.so ${datadir}" > +FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${libdir}/gstreamer-1.0/.debug" > +FILES_${PN}-dev += "${libdir}/gstreamer-1.0/*.la ${libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc" > +FILES_${PN}-staticdev += "${libdir}/gstreamer-1.0/*.a" > +FILES_${PN}-gplay = "${bindir}/gplay-1.0" > +FILES_${PN}-libgplaycore = "${libdir}/libgplaycore-1.0${SOLIBS}" > +FILES_${PN}-libgstfsl = "${libdir}/libgstfsl-1.0${SOLIBS}" > + > +COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mx6)" > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-freescale mailing list > meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org');> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org');> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
-- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
