Hi Eric,
On 02/06/2015 04:48 PM, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Nikolay,
Le Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:29:36 +0200,
[email protected] a écrit :
From: Nikolay Dimitrov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Dimitrov <[email protected]>
---
...Disable-imx6sl-specific-code-when-imx6sl-.patch | 419 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 419 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.10.17/0002-ARM-imx6sl-Disable-imx6sl-specific-code-when-imx6sl-.patch
diff --git
a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.10.17/0002-ARM-imx6sl-Disable-imx6sl-specific-code-when-imx6sl-.patch
b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.10.17/0002-ARM-imx6sl-Disable-imx6sl-specific-code-when-imx6sl-.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3255352
--- /dev/null
+++
b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-3.10.17/0002-ARM-imx6sl-Disable-imx6sl-specific-code-when-imx6sl-.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,419 @@
+From 351f605f08b7fb808ed3fdcb57f61db478be2c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Nikolay Dimitrov <[email protected]>
+Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:37:50 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] ARM: imx6sl: Disable imx6sl-specific code when imx6sl SOC
+ support is disabled
+
why is that needed ?
The patch purpose is to handle enabling/disabling CONFIG_SOC_IMX6SL.
Until now it wasn't possible due to some hard-coded pieces here and
there (build fails when imx6sl support is disabled).
Regards,
Nikolay
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
