Hi Otavio, Le Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:45:10 -0300, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Eric Bénard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:25:27 -0300, > > Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Eric Bénard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi Daiane, > >> > > >> > Le Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:54:14 -0300, > >> > Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> >> I'm sorry, Otavio, but you are not re-thinking what we have. I don't > >> >> think this list is fine. I don't see why to separate imx5 from imxs. > >> >> And, after GCC 5.X is up and linux-imx_2.6.35 is gone, imx5 will be > >> >> exactly like a imx3. > >> >> > >> > Does that mean there is an updated GPU library and full IPU drivers for > >> > more recent kernels than 2.6.35 for i.MX53 ? > >> > >> This means mx5 will likely don't have GPU support in Yocto Project > >> 1.9; VPU will likely work using mainline CODA. > >> > > and also most of the tools mixing VPU & IPU (CSI for example) ... > > Is that what you want in a "reference" BSP for reference platforms ? > > If Freescale does not upgrade the AMD support components for newer > kernel someone needs to do it. > > As a community member you are welcome to-do so, especially as Eukrea > has mx5-based SoMs. If no one does it, it will be removed. > So just remove it, no interest to spend time on that old chipset support in 2015 especially when AMD's libraries are proprietary and when Freescale didn't even bother to provide a hard float version despite several requests. Best regards Eric -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
