On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Fabio Estevam <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Otavio Salvador > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> I don't think u-boot has to have the monopoly so I will let that as an >>> exercise to others ;) >> >> In worse case, add the MXS power support to barebox so we can drop >> imx-bootlets as the quality of code is a disaster. > > Barebox does not need to use imx-bootlets anymore: > > commit 93ba78ece1eb153be1519b254b7ae4e1f8289b70 > Author: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> > Date: Tue Jan 20 14:52:39 2015 +0100 > > ARM: MXS: imx28evk: Add lowlevel support > > This switches the imx28evk to multiimage support and adds the > lowlevel initialization to make the bootlets unnecessary. > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> > > Looks like it is just a matter of upgrading the barebox recipe.
Awesome; so Alex let's upgrade it and drop imx-bootlets \m/ - Dead to disgusting code ;-) Yey! -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
