On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:35 AM Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:18 AM, Otavio Salvador >> <otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 4:45 AM Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> * See discussion at [1] >> >> * Tested for linux-fslc >> >> >> >> [1] >> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-April/149912.html >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@gmail.com> >> > >> > It is possible to include this in our Linux fork? it avoids the need >> > of applying it on multiple kernels as patch. >> > >> > What do you think? >> > >> Yes - that might help for the derived kernels in >> meta-freescale-3rdparty in the long term. Can you give me hints where >> to send the patch for both kernels fslc/frrescale? > > Send it as a PR to our linux-fslc fork against the desired branch. Hi Otavio,
* done for 4.17 [1] * wanted to do same for 4.18 but there were changes meanwhile. So patch does not apply and worst I have not time to tests. Let't postpone 4.18 until it is in mata-freescale - maybe it works fine then. [1] https://github.com/Freescale/linux-fslc/pull/30 Andreas -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
