On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Gary Bisson <gary.bis...@boundarydevices.com> wrote: >> For both is builds wayland-protocols_1.13.imx. So now the situation is >> even worth: It builds fine but the wrong version of wayland protocols. >> I think we need something like wayland-protocols-imx and >> PREFERRED_PROVIDER solution > > The preferred_provider should indeed fix the use-mainline-bsp usecase. At the risk of me repeating myself: All boards get wayland-protocols V3 tailored for imx. This is something a BSP should not do. > > However I wonder why we need such recipe, wouldn't a bbappend to the > wayland protocol recipe be sufficient? If yes: same - please make sure other boards are not affected. > > Looking at the patches, they could actually be brought down to 2 patches: > 1- add hdr10-metadata protocol > 2- add alpha-compositing protocol > > Those patches really are not intrusive so I'm pretty sure they'd apply > nicely on any version of wayland-protocol. > > Or maybe using the upstream version breaks things? > > As a FYI, I revived the alpha-compositing thread upstream so that it > could be merged someday [1]. > > Tom, is there any plan to upstream the hdr10-metadata protocol? > > Regards, > Gary > > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/170804/
Andreas -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale