Hi, On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:07 AM Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > --- > recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-boundary-fw-utils_2018.07.bb | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-boundary-fw-utils_2018.07.bb > b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-boundary-fw-utils_2018.07.bb > index 0a7697a..804a504 100644 > --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-boundary-fw-utils_2018.07.bb > +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-boundary-fw-utils_2018.07.bb > @@ -44,4 +44,5 @@ RPROVIDES_${PN} += "u-boot-fw-utils" > BBCLASSEXTEND = "cross" > > COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(imx)" > -COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_class-cross = "(.*)" > +COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_class-cross_arm = "(.*)" > +COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_class-cross_aarch64 = "(.*)"
Sorry for the dumb question but why is class-cross needed in the first place? Isn't MACHINE = (imx) sufficient to only target imx platforms which can only be arm/arm64. Regards, Gary -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale