On 19 September 2013 00:31, Darren Hart <dvh...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 23:23 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: >> Most BSPs appear to be derived from what appears to be a stale copy of the >> atom-pc xorg.conf which was either repeating defaults (the screen >> configuration), pointlessly hard-coding (specifying video driver when X can >> auto-probe), or actively harmful (disabling hotplugged input devices). >> Delete >> the files which can be removed, and remove the bad hotplug disabling options >> from the others. > > This has been something I've wanted to see improved for a long time. > Typically we do changes like with one patch per BSP to help keep things > a bit more flexible in the face of regressions.
I started doing that but then got rapidly bored with copy-paste... I can split it up though. > Which of these BSPs did you test and verify work after this patch? Two classes of patches: delete the file and trim the file. Where xorg.conf was deleted the only hardware I can (and did) test it on was NUC. I guess a representative sample of vesa and mga hardware should be verified to still boot. One instance of the trim patch was tested by Saul on his Minnow (whose report of a broken touchscreen prompted this series) and oe-core has had the same change for atom-pc/genericx86 for some time now. Ross _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel