On 6/18/14, 13:49, "Chad Bishop" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: Darren Hart [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 3:20 PM >> To: Chad Bishop; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [meta-intel] tags for dora-10.0.2-final or yocto-1.5.2 >> >> From: Chad Bishop <[email protected]> >> Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 at 7:31 >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: [meta-intel] tags for dora-10.0.2-final or yocto-1.5.2 >> >> >> >Hello meta-intel Team, >> > >> >Can you please tell me if meta-intel will be tagged for the dora-10.0.2 >> >/ >> >yocto-1.5.2 release? >> > >> >Thank You, >> >Chad Bishop >> >> Hi Chad, >> >> We do not respin meta-intel with point releases to match poky unless >>there is >> a need. Point releases to oe-core/poky/yocto should not be changing >>things in >> such a way as to require changes from dependent layers. >> >> Are you experiencing a problem with the dora meta-intel branch with the >> latest yocto 1.5 point release? >> >> >> -- >> Darren Hart >> Intel Open Source Technology Center >> >> >Hello Darren, > >Probably just a misunderstanding on my part. I had seen 1.4.1, 1.4.2 and >1.5.1 and just assumed it would be tagged when official. Though now I >see 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 were not. Those, in fact, were due to a flawed release process. They indicate that the meta-intel build was built on the specified poky version. They did not indicate any particular development milestone within meta-intel, however, as tags should. We will be correcting this confusion at the time of the 1.6 meta-intel release by purging all the meaningless tags. I do apologize for the confusion there. > >We have been working with 1.5.1 without any serious issues. > >We have updated meta-intel on dora to snag this : > >http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/commit/?h=dora&id=9e2 >7e3f734f5210b18c14607bb85810afa3ce027 > >in order to resolve this : > >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-intel/2014-May/002030.html > >However, that left the QA types feeling like we were in between an >official 1.5.1 and a 1.5.2 that would have gone through the full test >process. Thus my question. > >Thank you for the explanation. Please keep up the good work. Ah, that's a valid concern. It is always our aim to never introduce anything but important bug-fixes, always backports, to released branches. That said, point releases should happen afterward if significant changes have been made - or if only small changes were made and enough time has passed - as was the case there. Thanks! -- Darren Hart Open Source Technology Center [email protected] Intel Corporation -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
