Khem, I think it is appropriate to have this.
BTW, what RMC is based on actually supports non-x86 arches but meta-intel team haven’t verified non-x86 boards. Thanks lot! > On Nov 8, 2016, at 8:39 AM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Makes meta-intel behave well in multi-BSP scene > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > --- > common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc.bb | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc.bb b/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc.bb > index 9b87dd5..aeaf12e 100644 > --- a/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc.bb > +++ b/common/recipes-bsp/rmc/rmc.bb > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git" > > DEPENDS_class-target = "gnu-efi" > > +COMPATIBLE_HOST = "(x86_64.*|i.86.*)-linux*" > + > EXTRA_OEMAKE='RMC_CFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=both"' > > # from gnu-efi, we should align arch-mapping with it. > -- > 1.9.1 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-intel mailing list > meta-intel@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel