On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:26:14AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 10:07:47AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> bring recipes in sync with OE-Core, task bbclass > >> is now replaced by packagegroup. > >> > >> and task recipes are now called packagegroup_something > >> > >> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/multi-kernel.inc > >> b/recipes-kernel/linux/multi-kernel.inc > >> index 04bc987..96d6121 100644 > >> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/multi-kernel.inc > >> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/multi-kernel.inc > >> @@ -117,5 +117,5 @@ do_deploy_append () { > >> > >> } > >> > >> -do_compileconfigs[depends] += "u-boot-mkimage-native:do_populate_sysroot > >> virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc:do_populate_sysroot > >> virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX}:do_populate_sysroot" > >> +do_compileconfigs[depends] += "u-boot-mkimage-native:do_populate_sysroot > >> virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc:do_populate_sysroot" > > > > Why is this changed? Isn't gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX} no longer useful? > > > > this should have been a separate commit.
Then you wouldn't mind if I skip that hunk? > Its needed to accompany > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/35151/ Interesting. What's the status on that? -- Denys _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
