On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:47 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > as I wrote before, I have an older version. I used the kernel version of that > one to start up my new meta-ivi build. It crashed later with a kernel panic, > but at least the kernel is running. > > After that I compared the two kernel version I have, with mkimage -l. > > 1. Kernel version that is working quite well: > > mkimage -l uImage > Image Name: Linux-3.1.0 > Created: Fri Sep 21 11:25:32 2012 > Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed) > Data Size: 4144744 Bytes = 4047.60 kB = 3.95 MB > Load Address: 80008000 > Entry Point: 80008000 > > 2. Kernel version that fails after uncompression: > > mkimage -l uImage > Image Name: Linux-3.1.0 > Created: Thu Sep 27 07:07:25 2012 > Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed) > Data Size: 4176432 Bytes = 4078.55 kB = 3.98 MB > Load Address: 80008000 > Entry Point: 80008000 > > I don't see any major issues here, so I guess I need to check the toolchain > as proposed by Enrico. >
Download denzil SDK for arm which is gcc 4.6 based and compile kernel using that and see if that boots. There could be some kernel+toolchain interaction w.r.t gcc 4.7 which is what is default in current master/(would be 1.3) release, sometimes gcc exposes latent bugs in kernel and at times its wise versa > Christian > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Enrico > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 14:07 > An: Schulenberg Christian, EI-42 > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [meta-ti] pandaboard not booting > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm using the same kernel version as I did before. It's the default kernel >> 3.1 as configured in the meta-ti layer: ti-ubuntu-3.1.0-1282.11, Revision: >> a5c60c099296fcfc0c8fa8085c40883971486512 >> >> Do you really think it makes sense to switch to a more recent one? > > No, but i have no better ideas right now... > > You could check if it's a known toolchain bug with that kernel, but i > think it would be faster to try a newer kernel (from the same > repository, ti ubuntu integration). > > Enrico > _______________________________________________ > meta-ti mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
