On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Nicolas Dechesne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Enrico Butera <[email protected]> > wrote: >> +COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "pandaboard" > > i am not familiar too much with all the features of bitbake... but it > seems that 'omap4' should be better for the compatibility. our current > position is to request all OMAP4 boards/customers to use libdrm with > OMAP experiemental support, that the only config we (TI) actually > support. > > at some point, I would be interested to see libdrm-omap + > xf-video-omap being used on omap3 too.. but that's outside the scope > of *this* patch! > > and if you want to be proactive, you can add "omap4,omap5", as that's > what we support on omap5 too.
Actually i always wandered if omap4 could be used there, but since i was testing only on pandaboard i used that. I will change it into "omap4|omap5" then (in this recipe and all the others but linux-omap4). Enrico _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
