On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:11:50PM +0200, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > https://github.com/rvfh/meta-ti/commit/6342c03a0dba7d906db09630e57e2372998428df >> > >> > The recipe itself is quite trivial (I even had my own version in the works) >> > and I only have couple minor fixes around SRCREV and its comment... But >> > have >> > you compared the defconfigs between those two patches? I know the first >> > version of your patch used completely different unofficial defconfig... And >> > you didn't specify which one you have in v2. I'd prefer to use the >> > defconfig >> > that was validated by the GLP team. Thanks. >> >> i would still prefer that we create a somehow minimalist defconfig, i >> don't think using the 'monster' ubuntu defconfig (it has hundreds of >> drivers enabled....) makes too much sense for meta-ti. we used that >> because it was simpler for now, but I would hold on that patch until >> we have a simpler config. in fact we have already a config in the tree >> called omap4plus_defconfig, we will base on that one instead. > > Ok, I'm fine with that - we can work out a minimal config. > > >> also we should wait until we have GST and GFX up and running before >> merging the kernel, to avoid a couple of iterations. > > I would prefer to have the new kernel ASAP for many reasons. There were > several reports about 3.1 not booting for some people. So, resolving that > before Yocto Project 1.3 is released, is quite important. Plus, this gets us > aligned better with your current Ubuntu-based release. And we are now starting > to see patches against the old 3.1 kernel - by moving everyone to newer 3.4 we > avoid waisting people's time fixing and enhancing the old 3.1... > > So, I'd vote to get the new kernel first and worry about GST and GFX later. Do > you feel there will be extensive changes to the kernel recipe associated with > those? A little bit of churn on the defconfig would be acceptable...
I just tried the defconfig from github.com/rvfh/.... and gst ducati works too, so it's just a matter of putting it on a diet :) I don't know about GFX, but i vote too for including it now, it's "just" GFX that is out now. It can't be worse than the current 3.1 kernel! Enrico _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
